Service Layer
Comments
Anonymous
Jun 4, 2010
Jun 6, 2010
We've left AbstractController in for now, for backwards compatibility, but going forward we recommend using ServiceHelper directly. The methods in AbstractController aren't encapsulating much, and we feel it makes more sense to let people determine their preferred way of doing this. That said, for now you can use either one, there is no real difference.
Mar 11, 2011
Hi. Any helper for NetConnection?
Mar 14, 2011
Not right now. What would you like to see? Feel free to post to the Google Group and start a conversation and we can see what the community has to say. Thanks.
Anonymous
May 9, 2011
There is a small typo in the URLRequestHelper example.
loadConfig_httpStatus event:Event ):void
Should be:
loadConfig_httpStatus( event:Event ):void
May 9, 2011
Thanks, fixed!
I have a Controller that extends AbstractController. AbstractController and ServiceHelper contains the same method called executeServiceCall. So, what benefit would I get from using ServiceHelper? I assume that, ServiceHelper is used when there is no Controller, such as in the SwizPassiveViewExample?